A Quick but Comprehensive Protocol for Isolation and Short-Term Expansion of Tregs from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Treg Therapy in Animal Models and Human In Vitro Studies

Amir Hossein Mansourabadi^1,2,3, Farshid Noorbakhsh¹, Amir Ali Hamidieh³ and Aliakbar Amirzargar^{1* *}Correspondence: Aliakbar Amirzargar, Department of Aestetic and Restorative Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

One of the latest strategies to induce tolerance in patients in order to prevent transplant rejection is currently under investigation with regulatory Tcells (Tregs) nearing clinical application (Tang Q and Vincenti F, 2017). Tregs are specialized subpopulation of CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^low immune cells that belong to a small proportion of CD4⁺T lymphocytes (Romano M, et al., 2019). Tregs act to suppress the immune response via various mechanisms includes inhibition of immune cell proliferation and cytokine production that led to maintaining self-tolerance and homeostasis (Figure 1). Hence, Tregs play a critical role in preventing autoimmunity (Bluestone JA and Tang Q, 2018). Different subsets of Tregs with various functions exist. nTregs (natural Tregs) are generated through MHC class II-dependent TCR interactions in the thymus which results in the high-avidity selection, although further selection mechanisms may occur (Dall'Era M, et al., 2019; Göschl L, et al., 2019; Mansourabadi AH, et al., 2021). It is also proved that Foxp3⁺ Treg cells could also be generated outside the thymus under a variety of conditions (Gyori D, et al., 2018). CD4 CD25 iTregs (induced Treg) are generated in the periphery to control unexpected immune responses under inflammatory conditions, sub-immunogenic antigen presentation and normal homeostasis of the gut (Kim SH, et al., 2018; García EM, et al., 2020) (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Treg suppressive mechanisms.

Figure 2: Generation of tregs in different anatomical sites. nTregs differentiate in the thymus followed by migrating to peripheral tissues. iTregs differentiate in peripheral organs and secondary lymphoid organs. The circulating population of Tregs is comprised of both iTregs and nTregs. It is thought that iTregs and nTregs differ in their TCR repertoire because iTregs are derived from naive TCD4⁺ cells in the periphery.

While a defect in Treg function and number is believed to be associated with the development of several autoimmune diseases, reinforcement of Tregs has been proved to be beneficial in treating autoimmunity as well as in preclinical models (Miao J and Zhu P, 2018).

In vitro expanded Tregs can be used for any downstream application such as suppression assays, cytokine analysis, and gene expression. Also, Treg-based cell therapy has also shown initial promise in clinical trials (Göschl L, et al., 2019). As Tregs account only for 5%-10% of the total CD4⁺T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood in vitro Treg expansion is essential for the clinical applications of these cells (Li P, et al., 2017). Clinical translation of Treg therapy is also barricaded by other limitations such as lack of an easy and fast method for expansion of Tregs and higher cost associated with GMP-grade cell sorting (Li P, et al., 2017; Jiang W, et al., 2020; Liu Q, et al., 2019). As the conventional protocols require a complicated and long period of in vitro expansion of Treg numbers, here we presented a feasible and simple protocol using IL-2, anti-CD3/CD28 beads, and rapamycin for the isolation and expansion of Tregs from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs).

Materials and Methods

CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^dim/– Treg isolation with MACS technique

Three cell surface markers include CD4, CD25 and CD127 or two cell surface markers include CD4, CD25 along with one intracellular marker (FOXP3) can be used to isolate Tregs from PBMC. In the current protocol, due to the more feasibility, cheaper, and ease of work, using cell surface markers for Treg isolation is recommended (Schoenbrunn A, et al., 2012). The CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^dim/–Treg isolation is performed in a two-simple step. First, labeling the non-CD4⁺ and CD127high cells using magnetically labeled antibodies and second, using anti-biotin monoclonal antibodies conjugated to micro beads. The steps are as follows-

Isolation of PBMCs using Ficoll: Dilute the blood sample at 1:1 volume ratio with the appropriate medium (or PBS). Add a volume of density gradient medium to a fresh tube according to the specifications for that density gradient medium. Then, gently layer the diluted blood on top of the density gradient medium. Centrifuge for 30 min at 400 g with the break off. Aspirate plasma and platelets on the upper layer using a sterile pipette to avoid platelet contamination. Harvest the cells by inserting he pipette directly through the upper plasma layer to the mononuclear cells at the interface. Finally, wash the harvested cells twice in the appropriate buffer for 5 min at 300 g. The cells are now ready for cell separations (Jia Y, et al., 2018; Gill PK, 2019).

Results and Discussion

Treg cell separation using MACS column, step 1

In the first place, the cell number should be determined and the cell suspension should be spun at 300 g for 10 min followed by aspiration of the supernatant. Then, the cell pellet should be resuspended in 40 µL of MACS buffer (PBS with 2 mM EDTA and 0.5% BSA) per 10⁷ total cells. 10 µL of CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127-biotinylated antibody per 10⁷ total cells should be added followed by incubation for 5 min in 2°C-8°C. In the following, 20 µL of anti-biotin microbeads and 30 µL of MACS buffer per 10⁷ total cells should be added followed by second incubation for 10 min in 2°C-8°C. Before applying the cell suspension onto the LD MACS column, the column should be rinsed using 2 mL of MACS buffer. In this step, pass-through cells should be collected after adding the mentioned cell suspension onto the column. The cells resulting from this step are unlabelled CD4⁺ cell fractions (Zhou Y, et al., 2020; Karimi N, et al., 2020).

Treg cell separation using MACS column, step 2

Centrifuge the cells obtained from the previous step at 300 g for 10 min and remove the supernatant completely. In the following, the cell pellet should be resuspended in 90 µL of MACS buffer per 10⁷ total cells. At this step, 10 µL of CD25 Beads per 10⁷ total cells should be added followed by incubation for 5 min in 2°C-8°C. At the last step, cells should be washed once by adding 1 mL of MACS buffer and centrifuge for 10 minutes at 300 g and supernatant should be discarded immediately. Before adding the washed cells to the MS column, cell pelleted should be resuspended in 0.5 mL of MACS buffer per 10⁸ total cells. Before applying the cell suspension onto the MS MACS column, the column should be rinsed using 0.5 mL of MACS buffer. In this step, cell suspension should be added to the pre-washed MS column. Flow-through obtained from this step is containing unlabeled cells (Milward K, et al., 2020; Ren Q, et al., 2019).

Remove the MS column from the stand and place it on sterile 15 mL conical falcon tubes. Now to separate magnetically labeled cells from the MS column, 1 mL of MACS buffer should be added onto the MS column and the plunger must be pushed immediately and firmly. The flow-through obtained at this stage contains the Tregs we are looking for.

Flow cytometry analysis of isolated CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^dim/– Tregs

Isolated cells should be washed with fresh and complete TEXMACS medium at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatant should be discarded. Single cell suspensions should be incubated with 2 µL of FITC-conjugated anti-CD4, 2 µL of APC-conjugated anti-CD25 and 2 µL of PE-conjugated anti-CD25 per 10⁶ total cells for 30 min on the ice (or in the 4°C). After incubation period, stained cells should be washed twice with 500 µL of flow cytometry buffer (PBS with 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide) at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatant should be discarded. At the end, 500 µL of flow cytometry buffer should be added and data should be collected with flow cytometry (Figure 3A and 3B). Delays of more than 24 hours may increase the chance of obtaining false-negative or false-positive hence, we recommend fixing the cells using 4% paraformaldehyde solution (diluted in PBS) and storing the fixed cells at 2 to 8°C.

Figure 3: Treg purification from the human PBMC using MACS column, percentage after short-term expansion and the plasticity in the presence of inflammatory cytokine. gating on CD4⁺CD25⁺ population before expansion (A). The percent of CD127- cells in the population of CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells is shown (B). Live/dead exclusion using 7-AAD (a nucleic acid binding dye). They are excluded by live cells, as these dyes are not membrane permeable (C). Gating on CD4⁺CD25⁺ population after expansion using 100 nM rapamycin, 500 IU IL-2, and 10% human AB serum and in the presence of anti-CD3/CD28 microbeads (D). The percent of CD127-cells in the population of gated CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells is shown (E). Expression of IL-17 in the Tregs in the absence of inflammatory cytokines (baseline) (F). Expression of IL-17 in the Tregs that expanded in a medium containing 10 ng/ml IL-1β, 4 ng/ml IL-6, 5 ng/ml TGF-β and 10 IU/ml IL-2 without rapamycin for 72 h (G). Intracellular staining for IL-17 in the Tregs that expanded in a medium containing 10 ng/ml IL-1β, 4 ng/ml IL-6, 5 ng/ml TGF-β and 10 IU/ml IL-2 for and 500 nM rapamycin for 72 h (H and I). The suppressive ability of expanded Tregs was assessed as the percentage decrease of Tresp proliferation in the presence of two different ratios of Tregs. The calculation should be based on the proliferation of Tresp in the presence of anti-CD3/CD28 beads compared with the proliferation of cultures also containing expanded Tregs (J).

Fast and simple protocol for Treg expansion in vitro

Tregs isolated from the PBMC of beta-thalassemia major kids expanded rapidly with comparable fold-expansion during the 5 days of culture. At day 0, isolated Tregs should be cocultured with 50-100 IU/ml pen-strep, 1 mM Sodium pyruvate (C₃H₃NaO₃), 25 mM Hepes, 100 nM rapamycin, 500 IU IL-2, and 10% human AB serum (or FBS) in TEXMACS medium (Fraser H, et al., 2018). Isolated Tregs should be also activated with anti-CD3/CD28 coated beads at a 4:1 bead:cell ratio at day 0. Fresh culture medium containing 500 IU/ml IL-2 should be added at day 3 and day 5 post-expansion. Flow cytometric analysis should be performed on harvested cells at day 5 post-expansion. Briefly, cells should be washed and stained with the mentioned antibodies in part 4 for 30 min at 4°C. Appropriate isotype control antibodies should be used for each sample. Following staining, cells were examined by flow cytometry (Figure 3C- 3E).

Functional assay of expanded Tregs

We took advantage of Treg functional (suppression) assays to evaluate the functional effect of expanded Tregs on responding T cells (Tresp). This assay was performed by co-culturing the responding population with the in vitro expanded Tregs. Responder T cells were obtained from PBMCs using MACS by negative selection.

For assessing the proliferation of Tresp in the presence of expanded Tregs, Tresp should be labeled using Carboxyfluorescein Succinimidyl Ester (CFSE) dye in the first place. For this purpose, isolated Tresp should be washed and the pellet should be resuspended in 1 ml PBS containing 0.1% BSA per 2 × 10⁶ total cells. 1 µL of 5 mM CFSE dye should be added followed by incubation in a dark place at Room Temperature (RT) for 15 min. After the incubation period, 10 ml of cold complete culture medium should be added and the tube should be incubated again on the ice for 5 min. In the next step, cells should be washed with a complete culture medium twice to discard unattached and additional CFSE. Now, labeled Tresps are ready for suppression assay (Safinia N, et al., 2018). 1 × 10⁵ per well of Tresp should be co-cultured with Tregs at different ratios (Treg: Teff=2:1 and 8:1) in TEXMACS medium supplemented with 10% FBS and in the presence of anti-CD3/CD28-coated beads at a 4:1 bead: cell ratio in 24-well flat-bottom plates. Cells should be incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO₂ and 98% O₂ for 5 days. After harvesting the cells, the proliferation of CFSE-labelled Tresps should be determined using flow cytometry (Figure 3J).

Treg plasticity in the inflammatory environment is the most challenging aspect

Treg plasticity and their conversion to producing inflammatory cytokine cells in the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines are the major concerns in Treg immunotherapy. Plastic Tregs have several features of Th cells including the expression of specific transcription factors in Th cells and the secretion of Th-related cytokines, while still maintaining the expression of specific transcription factors for Treg (Lee YK, et al., 2009; Kleinewietfeld M and Hafler DA, 2013). Hence, the plastic differentiation of Tregs not only shows an association with changes in the stability of Tregs but also increases the complexity of the immune circumstances under inflammatory conditions, especially autoimmune diseases. Signalling through IL-1 receptor and IL-6 receptor in combination with signalling through TGF-β receptor and TCR engagement, induces strong expression of STAT3 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3) and RORγT (Retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gamma T) transcription factors which drive the differentiation of conventional T cells to a Th17 lineage in inflammatory conditions (Safinia N, et al., 2018). The capacity of Tregs to adopt a Th1 phenotype has been also demonstrated in murine models (Koch MA, et al., 2009). Nevertheless, the plasticity of the human Treg compartment is still uncharacterized. Moreover, it is not clear to what extent cytokine production by Tregs is due to true plasticity rather than to heterogeneity in the population. Hence, assuming that naive Tregs are capable of upregulating the expression of Th17-associated IL-17 in response to inflammatory cytokines, we simulated inflammatory conditions for expanded Tregs in the culture medium. For this purpose, already expanded Tregs were cultured for 72 hours in a medium containing 10 ng/ml IL-1β, 4 ng/ml IL-6, 5 ng/ml TGF-β and 10 IU/ml IL-2 with or without 500 nM rapamycin (Figure 3F-3I). After harvesting the cells, intracellular staining for IL-7 was done as follows:

After harvesting the Tregs, a single-cell suspension at a concentration of 1 × 10⁶ cells/mL in cell straining buffer (PBS containing 2% FBS) should be prepared. For the fixing step, 1 mL fixation buffer (PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde) per 1 × 10⁶ cells should be added followed by incubation for 15 min at RT. After Centrifuging at 500 g for 5 min at RT, supernatant should be discarded to remove the fixation buffer and a second and third wash of fixed cells with cell staining buffer should be done at 500 g for 5 min.

For permeabilizing the cells, fixed cells should be resuspended in 1 mL permeabilization buffer (0.2% Tween) per 1 × 10⁶ cells and centrifuge at 500 g for 5 minutes at RT followed by removing the supernatant. In the following fixed and permeabilized cells should be washed twice with 0.1% Tween.

For the staining step, in the first place, the primary antibody should be diluted with permeabilization buffer for an optimal working concentration. Fixed and permeabilized cells should be resuspended in PBS containing 2% FBS, 0.1% Tween, and 2 µL of PE-conjugated anti-IL-17 antibody solution followed by incubating for 20 min on the ice (or at 4°C). After the incubation period, the cells must be centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min at 4°C followed by discarding the supernatant and washed twice with 0.1% Tween (or permeabilization buffer). As the last step, fixed, permeabilized, and intracellular stained Tregs should be resuspended in 500 uL of cell staining buffer for final analysis. The intracellular expression of IL-17 should be determined using flow cytometry.

Conclusion

The feasibility of Treg therapy depends on success in the expansion of sufficient Treg cell numbers in vitro. Using our described protocol for isolation and expansion of Tregs, the appropriate number of CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^dim/-Tregs could be achieved for animal and in vitro studies in a short period of time. Also, the functional assay of Tregs after expansion using our protocol showed that the expanded cells maintained their inhibitory function, especially at higher doses (1:8 Tresp: Treg). Reaching a larger number of cells requires longer cultivation. Tregs have been demonstrated plastic differentiation in inflammatory situations, and their stability, which is characterized by the stable expression of specific factors, becomes abnormal.

Our data also confirmed that over the 72 hour culture period in the presence of inflammatory cytokines and in the absence of rapamycin, intracellular expression of IL-17 in Tregs showed upregulation compared to the baseline, while rapamycin resulted in the production of a stable population of Tregs with a reduction in the intracellular expression of IL-17 in Tregs compared to the group without rapamycin. Therefore, to maintain the plasticity and stability of expanded Tregs in clinical studies, it is recommended to use immunosuppressive drugs such as rapamycin along with Treg therapy.

Funding

This work was supported by [National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) (grant Number [995705]) and Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) (grant number [98002620]), and Tehran University of Medical Sciences (grant number [98-01-30-41768])]. The authors also acknowledge the Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, for their assistance.

Author's Contribution

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Amir Hossein Mansourabadi], [Farshid Noorbakhsh] and [Aliakbar Amirzargar]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Amir Hossein Mansourabadi], and [Farshid Noorbakhsh] and [Amir Ali Hamidieh] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University B (Date2019/No IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1398.566).

References

1. Tang Q, Vincenti F. Transplant trials with Tregs:  Perils and promises. J Clin Invest. 2017; 127(7): 2505-2512.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

2. Romano M, Fanelli G, Albany CJ, Giganti G, Lombardi G. Past, present, and future of regulatory T cell therapy in transplantation and autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2019; 10: 43.  

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

3. Bluestone JA, Tang Q. Treg cells-the next frontier of cell therapy. Science. 2018; 362(6411): 154-5.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

4. Dall'Era M, Pauli ML, Remedios K, Taravati K, Sandova PM, Putnam AL, et al. Adoptive Treg cell therapy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71(3): 431-440.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

5. Göschl L, Scheinecker C, Bonelli M. Treg cells in autoimmunity: From identification to Treg-based therapies. Semin immunopathol. 2019.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

6. Mansourabadi AH, Khosroshahi LM, Noorbakhsh F, Amirzargar A. Cell therapy in transplantation: A comprehensive review of the current applications of cell therapy in transplant patients with the focus on Tregs, CAR Tregs, and mesenchymal stem cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021; 97: 107669.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

7. Gyori D, Lim EL, Grant FM, Spensberger D, Roychoudhuri R, Shuttleworth SJ, et al. Compensation between CSF1R+ macrophages and Foxp3+ Treg cells drives resistance to tumor immunotherapy. JCI insight. 2018; 3(11).

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

8. Kim SH, Saba E, Kim BK, Yang WK, Park YC, Shin HJ, et al. Luteolin attenuates airway inflammation by inducing the transition of CD4⁺ CD25-to CD4⁺ CD25⁺ regulatory T cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018; 820: 53-64.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

9. García EM, Galicia-Carreón J, Novak N. In vitro conversion into CD4⁺ CD25⁺ Foxp3+ induced regulatory t cells is reduced in atopic dermatitis patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020; 181(5): 353-356.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

10. Miao J, Zhu P. Functional defects of Treg cells: New targets in rheumatic diseases, including ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018; 20(5): 1-8.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

11. Li P, Wang L, Zhou Y, Gan Y, Zhu W, Xia Y, et al. C‐C Chemokine Receptor type 5 (CCR 5)‐mediated docking of transferred Tregs protects against early blood‐brain barrier disruption after stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(8): e006387.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

12. Jiang W, Li X, Ding H, Wang K, Liu X, Wang Q, et al. PD-1 in Tregs predicts the survival in sepsis patients using sepsis-3 criteria: A prospective, two-stage study. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020; 89: 107175.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

13. Liu Q, Dwyer GK, Zhao Y, Li H, Mathews LR, Chakka AB, et al. IL-33-mediated IL-13 secretion by ST2+ Tregs controls inflammation after lung injury. JCI insight. 2019; 4(6): e123919.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

14. Schoenbrunn A, Frentsch M, Kohler S, Keye J, Dooms H, Moewes B, et al. A converse 4-1BB and CD40 ligand expression pattern delineates activated regulatory T cells (Treg) and conventional T cells enabling direct isolation of alloantigen-reactive natural Foxp3+ Treg. J Immunol. 2012; 189(12): 5985-5994.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

15. Jia Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wei C, Guo R, Wang F, et al. A modified Ficoll-Paque gradient method for isolating mononuclear cells from the peripheral and umbilical cord blood of humans for biobanks and clinical laboratories. Biopreserv Biobank. 2018;16(2): 82-91.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

16. Gill PK. Rapid isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from whole blood with ficoll hypaque density centrifugation. J Int Res Med Pharm Sci. 2019; 14: 17-20.

    [Google scholar]

17. Zhou Y, Grieser AM, Do J, Itsara LS, Vaughan AM, Ghosh AK. Purification and production of Plasmodium falciparum zygotes from in vitro culture using magnetic column and percoll density gradient. Malaria journal. 2020; 19: 1-10.

    [Google scholar]

18. Karimi N, Oloomi M, Orafa Z. Circulating tumor cells detection in patients with early breast cancer using MACS immunomagnetic flow cytometry. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2020; 12(3): 148.

    [Google scholar] [PubMed]

19. Milward K, Hester J, Wood KJ. Isolation of human regulatory T lymphocytes by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.  Immunological tolerance: Springer; 2019; 43-54.
20. Ren Q, Jiang C, Liu J. CFDA-SE combined with MACSiBeads™ particles to evaluate the inhibitory effect of Treg cells in vitro. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2019; 49(6): 740-747.

    [Google scholar] [PubMed]

21. Fraser H, Safinia N, Grageda N, Thirkell S, Lowe K, Fry LJ, et al. A rapamycin-based GMP-compatible process for the isolation and expansion of regulatory T cells for clinical trials. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2018; 8: 198-209.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

22. Safinia N, Grageda N, Scottà C, Thirkell S, Fry LJ, Vaikunthanathan T, et al. Cell therapy in organ transplantation: Our experience on the clinical translation of regulatory T cells. Front immunol. 2018; 9: 354.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

23. Lee YK, Mukasa R, Hatton RD, Weaver CT. Developmental plasticity of Th17 and Treg cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;  21(3):  274-280.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

24. Kleinewietfeld M, Hafler DA. The plasticity of human Treg and Th17 cells and its role in autoimmunity. Semin immunol. 2013; 25(4): 305-312.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]

25. Koch MA, Perdue NR, Killebrew JR, Urdahl KB, Campbell DJ. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2009; 10(6): 595-602.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [PubMed]