Boerhaave’s Syndrome: A Case Report

Mahmoud Saqr¹, Ahmed Almasloot^2*, Mahmoud Eltawagny¹ and Osama Hawana^{1 *}Correspondence: Ahmed Almasloot, Department of Emergency Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia, Email:

Author info »

Abbreviations

CT: Computed Tomography; ED: Emergency Department; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; RR: Respiratory Rate; NPO: Nil per Oral; IV: Intravenous; CBC: Complete Blood Count; URTI: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection; AUD: Alcohol Use Disorder; CTICU: Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit; OGD: Oesophago-Gastro-Duodenoscopy; GEJ: Gastro-Esophageal Junction; CXR: Chest X-Ray

Introduction

Boerhaave’s syndrome is a rare but serious condition that is characterized by oesophageal non-traumatic rupture, it usually happens after forceful vomiting. If not diagnosed and treated early, it can be fatal. Challenge is the variation in clinical pictures and presentations (Kopelman Y, et al., 2018). It requires urgent intervention in most of the cases (Tiago C, et al., 2022). Epidemiological data regarding oesophageal perforation is sparse. In a national study in Iceland, the incidence was reported as 3.1 per million populations (Vidarsdottir H, et al., 2010). A systematic review reported that spontaneous oesophageal perforation incidence among the other causes of rupture is 38% (Sdralis EI, et al., 2017). A case of postoperative oesophageal rupture was reported (Atallah FN, et al., 2004). Around 70% of the oesophageal rupture is thoracic (Sancheti MS and Fernandez FG, 2015; Shaker H, et al., 2010). Clinical presentation usually depends on the site, size, and onset of perforation, according to Medscape: Patients with cervical oesophagus perforation may present with neck or upper chest pain. Patients with middle or lower oesophagus perforation may present with interscapular or epigastric discomfort. Findings of pleural effusion are common. If present, subcutaneous emphysema is particularly helpful in confirming the diagnosis. Subcutaneous emphysema is seen in 28%-66% of patients at initial presentation. More typically, subcutaneous emphysema is found later. Other classic findings include tachypnoea and abdominal rigidity.

Tachycardia, diaphoresis, fever, and hypotension are common, particularly as the illness progresses. However, these findings are non-specific. The mortality rate is about 13% (Sdralis EI, et al., 2017). Different diagnostic modalities are being used; CT confirmed the diagnosis (38.7%), X-ray (36.6%) and endoscopy (37.4%) (Sdralis EI, et al., 2017). Using CT scans with/without contrast media has a false negative rate of 10% (Shaker H, et al., 2010; Lázár G, et al., 2011). A rapid diagnosis with chest drains after diagnosing a left-sided pleural effusion/pneumothorax is indicative when the chest tube drains bile or food particles (Suzuki M, et al., 2012). Early management, involvement of senior experienced physician and early diagnosis has been shown to have a good impact on decreasing mortality (Zuleta GMA, et al., 2014). Treatment is usually surgical, depending on the severity of perforation, and some reports described recovery also after conservative management (de Schipper JP, et al., 2009). There is no clear data about the long-term survival rates after Boerhaave’s syndrome, some studies revealed three years survival of 90% with surgical treatment (de Schipper JP, et al., 2009).

Case Presentation

A 39-year-old patient presents to the emergency department in Hamad General Hospital in Qatar (a large tertiary hospital), the patient complained of severe abdominal pain and two episodes of forceful vomiting that had started 4 hours before he presented to the ED. The patient described the pain as severe generalized (all quadrants), colicky with no radiation to any area, he had constipation for 2 days, and no active vomiting on presentation. The patient had a history of chronic alcohol intake, last alcohol consumption wince one week (as per the patient himself). Examination revealed tenderness, and rigidity in all abdominal quadrants, and chest examination was normal. Vital signs were normal, blood pressure (Systolic BP-150), pulse 105/min, RR 20/min with normal temperature.

Treatment

After initial analgesia, the patient showed improvement and started to localize the pain to the

Epigastrium and periumbilical area. Given the history of alcohol consumption and normal chest and abdomen X-rays, the patient was investigated as a case of possible pancreatitis and was kept NPO (Nil per Oral). After 4 hours of observation, the patient was pain-free, still in constipation and had no vomiting. On further reassessment, the patient was not in severe pain, still constipating but had a normal bowel sound, and a rectal exam showed stool matter. Enema was given and patiently passed stool. The patient was kept for observation, IV antibiotics were commenced because he was febrile, and WBCs came higher in repeat CBC. He then gave a history of URTI cough and expectoration.

Results

Investigation

To rule out the acute cardiac event, an ECG, (Figure 1) was done, and it showed no acute ischemic signs. Immediate chest X-ray (Figure 2) and abdominal X-ray were obtained to rule out acute abdominal viscus perforation and intestinal obstruction, and both showed no air under diaphragm, normal mediastinum, and no air-fluid level in the abdomen.

Table 1: CBC showing leucocytosis and neutrophilia

Figure 1: ECG, showing normal sinus rhythm, and no/ischemic changes

Figure 2: CXR showing normal mediastinum and no air under diaphragm

Blood investigations were done, CBC (Table 1) (Complete Blood Count) showed leucocytosis with neutrophilia and high normal Hb which implied dehydration, normal pancreatic enzymes, normal liver function tests (Table 2) normal renal functions, and mild hypokalaemia (Table 3). Ultrasound abdomen was done, and it was normal. After 24 hours in the observation unit, the patient started to develop chest pain, high-grade fever, and tachycardia. Antibiotics were changed to sepsis protocol and an immediate chest X-ray (Figure 3) was ordered. X-ray showed wide mediastinum with mediastinal emphysema, suspected AUD, and multiple infiltrations. Immediate CT chest with contrast oral and IV was ordered to investigate oesophageal rupture and it was positive for features suggesting oesophageal rupture with the mediastinal collection and pleural effusion (Figures 4 and 5).

Table 2: Normal liver function results, normal amylase and elevated CRP

Table 3: Mild hypokalaemia and normal troponin

Figure 3: CXR showing wide mediastinum, mediastinal emphysema, and multiple infiltrations

Figure 4: CT chest with oral and IV contrast showing signs of rupture

Figure 5: Oral and IV contrast showing signs of rupture oesophagus, mediastinal collection, and bilateral pleural effusion

surgery consultation was done, and a barium swallow was done which confirmed the diagnosis of intrathoracic oesophageal rupture. The patient was shifted to CTICU (Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit) where urgent endoscopy was done in the theatre. After admission, OGD was done and revealed oesophageal perforation at about 33 cm from the incisors, and the GEJ was at 40 cm at the oesophageal opening of the diaphragm. Treated with stenting which showed migration then it was replaced. The stent was removed after 6 weeks. The patient resumed feeding and was discharged home after 2 months of admission. The patient had his first follow-up in the clinic, and he was doing well eating all solid food with no sequel.

Discussion

In this case, we did not detail the surgical management as we focused on the emergency department course of the boerhaave’s syndrome and the challenges that encounter any clinician in the diagnosis. This case was very close to being named atypical presentation because of some points that ambiguated the diagnosis-

• The patient presented to ED with abdominal pain only, colicky in nature generalized, and he did not link the pain to vomiting. The pain was never in the chest, shoulders or back. Given the fact that the perforation was intrathoracic, however, the low site of perforation, only 7 cm above the diaphragm made the site of pain in the abdomen.

• Chest X-ray was taken 5 hours after symptoms and yet showed no changes at all. In our perspective, this could be explained by the containment of the perforation after the initial release of contents. And we favour that this increases the emphasis on low sensitivity for such tests to rule out the condition.

• The patient became pain-free after analgesia, his main complaint lately was fever, but because of inflammatory markers and initial presentation, he was not discharged.

• The concomitant occurrence of URTI and fever, which happened 3 days before presentation, hindered further investigating of the septic focus for such infection.

Conclusion

What we conclude from this case is that a high index of suspicion should be made for the diagnosis of spontaneous oesophageal perforations. Despite the fact being rare, Boerhaave’s disease should be on the list of possible diagnoses, especially if risk factors like alcoholism and a history of vomiting exist. Also, the diagnostic process should be guided by a clinical picture, but it should not only be bound to it. The presence of findings like leucocytosis and high inflammatory markers should widen the range of differential diagnoses and push to further diagnostic modalities, like early CT abdomen, even if pain improved in the case that definitive diagnosis is not already obtained.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Mahmoud Saqr, Ahmed Almasloot, Osama Hawana and Mahmoud Eltawagny. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mahmoud Saqr and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical Approval

The ethical approval is Exempt from the Medical Research Center at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar and Prince Sultan Military Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia. We certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

A sentence confirming that written informed consent was obtained from all participants or, if participants are under 16, from a parent and/or legal guardian.