Brief Report - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 4

SARS-COV-2 Vaccine Hesitancy

Gudisa Bereda*
 
*Correspondence: Gudisa Bereda, Department of Pharmacy, Negelle Health Science College, Guji, Ethiopia, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization, vaccination hesitancy is a behavior that is influenced by a number of variables, including concerns with confidence (do not trust vaccine or provider), complacency (do not recognize a need for a vaccine, do not value the vaccine), and convenience (access). Low trust in vaccinations and low uptake are mostly caused by structural factors such as health disparities, socioeconomic disadvantages, systemic racism, and access hurdles. Vaccine reluctance can be viewed as a widespread occurrence with variations in the reasons given for vaccine rejection. The perceived dangers vs. advantages, specific religious views, and lack of knowledge and awareness were the most common justifications for vaccination rejection. There are three main causes of vaccine hesitancy-

• Lack of trust in and fear of vaccines, especially due to the misconception that vaccines carry a risk of infection
• Lack of understanding of the need for a vaccine (for example, due to an underestimation of the severity of the disease)
• Difficulty in obtaining the vaccine for an individual or a community.

Keywords

Confidence, SARS-COV-2, Vaccine hesitancy

Introduction

Vaccine hesitation is described by the World Health Organization as “a delay in accepting or refusing safe immunizations notwithstanding the existence of vaccine services (Tola G, 2021; WHO, 2013; Veatch JR, et al., 2021).” Vaccine hesitation can be a complex cognitive and behavioral construct that varies depending on the vaccine, the location, and the circumstance (WHO, 2014; Webb Hooper M, et al., 2021). Conspiracy theories, anxiety, skepticism, mistrust of scientific knowledge, and a lack of information can all contribute to vaccine hesitation (Bereda G, 2021; Bullock J, et al., 2022). Vaccine reluctance can be viewed as a widespread occurrence with variations in the reasons given for vaccine rejection. The most common justifications for vaccination rejection included perceived risks against benefits, particular religious convictions, and a lack of information and awareness (Sallam M, 2021; Lane S, et al., 2018; Wagner AL, et al., 2019; Health TL, 2019; Karafillakis E and Larson HJ, 2017; Pelčić G, et al., 2016; Bereda G, 2022). People who are vaccine-hesitant are a diverse population that has varying degrees of hesitation regarding particular immunizations (Tola G, 2021). The “5C model of the causes of vaccination hesitation,” a concept developed from studies conducted in high-income nations, lists five key individual person-level factors for vaccine reluctance.

Description

Confidence

Lack of SARS-COV-2 vaccination confidence puts health at risk in both direct and indirect ways and might divert attention from attempts to stop the current epidemic. Social disadvantages like low education and limited access to accurate information, misinformation, disinformation, rumors, and conspiracy theories, especially on social media, a lack of effective public health messages or targeted campaigns, structural racism, healthcare and socioeconomic inequities, and research on some ethnic minority classes conducted in the past in an unethical manner are some of the causes and drivers of low confidence in SARS-COV-2 vaccines.

Complacency

It comes from the belief that vaccinations are unneeded because one believes they have a minimal chance of contracting SARS-COV-2 or suffering severe illness effects, or because this belief is a persistent barrier to vaccination. The patients think there is a high danger of getting SARS-COV-2 and that getting the vaccination might have a negative impact on their life and the lives of those close to them (The Royal Society and the British Academy, 2020; Razai MS, et al., 2021).

Convenience (or constraints)

Some people believe they can’t afford to get immunized, and some people are suspicious because they can’t physically access a vaccination facility. Many people have incorrect beliefs about the quality of immunization services (SAGE, 2021).

Calculation of risk

It is to deliberately compare the hazards of infection versus vaccination in order to make a choice. The vaccination has fully persistent side effects and unknowable long-term health repercussions, according to a variety of persons (WHO, 2014).

Collective responsibility

A decreased desire to get the SARS-COV-2 vaccine is associated with a reduced feeling of communal responsibility (Afolabi AA and Ilesanmi OS, 2021).

Today, a number of psychological theories have been put forth in relation to vaccine hesitancy, including altruistic beliefs, neuroticism and conscientiousness as personality traits, conspiracy, religious, and paranoid beliefs, and distrust of reputable members of society like government officials, scientists, and medical professionals (Nazlı ŞB, et al., 2022; Rieger MO, 2020; Johnson MO, 2000; Hornsey MJ, et al., 2018; Habersaat KB and Jackson C, 2020; Almaghaslah D, et al., 2021; Coustasse A, et al., 2021). SARSCOV-2 vaccine hesitation is frequently associated with characteristics that also have an effect on vaccination hesitancy for other vaccines. These variables include political variables, attitudes and beliefs connected to vaccinations, and vaccination-associated characteristics (Rutten LJ, et al., 2021; Jacobson RM, et al., 2015).

Individual attitudes

Greater reluctance has also been linked to outright skepticism in vaccination, false beliefs about the seriousness of SARS-COV-2 infection, and a preference for spontaneous immunity. Younger people, those with less education, those without jobs, those who are jobless, and several ethnic and racial minority groups, including Hispanics and African Americans, who have been disproportionately impacted by SARS-COV-2, all showed greater vaccination hesitation (Rutten LJ, et al., 2021; Kreps S, et al., 2020; Malik AA, et al., 2020; Pogue K, et al., 2020; Reiter PL, et al., 2020; Trogen B, et al., 2020).

Political factors

Attempts to swiftly proceed with aggressive federal financing and deploy vaccinations with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization may exacerbate worries about vaccine safety and efficacy. Data from public surveys in the United States also show the impact of political issues on reluctance, where lack of faith in vaccine advocates, the nation of vaccine origin, and worries about commercial or political objectives increase public mistrust (Rutten LJ, et al., 2021; Fisher KA, et al., 2020).

Vaccine attributes

According to survey results, there is general skepticism regarding the efficiency of the SARS-COV-2 vaccination, doubt regarding the duration of protection, and concern regarding safety or negative consequences. Important data on the characteristics of vaccines, such as immunity duration and immunogenicity, are steadily accumulating and will differ by vaccine manufacturer and/or between populations. The public’s confidence is at risk due to the developing understanding of SARS-COV-2 immunology and virology as well as the historically rapid development of vaccines (Rutten LJ, et al., 2021; Khamsi R, et al., 2020; Kirkcaldy RD, et al., 2020; Yi Y, et al., 2020; Feng W, et al., 2020; Lurie N, et al., 2020).

A complicated decision-making process promotes vaccine reluctance. These elements include communication and media, historical effects, religion/culture/gender/socioeconomic, political, geographic obstacles, prior vaccination experience, risk perception, and vaccination program design (Corey L, et al., 2020; Soares P, et al., 2021; WHO, 2012; Kwok KO, et al., 2021; Mose A, et al., 2022; Saied SM, et al., 2021; Kanyike AM, et al., 2021; MacDonald NE, et al., 2015; Lucia VC, et al., 2021).

Conclusion

The term “vaccine hesitancy” refers to the hesitation or refusal to get a vaccination against a disease, even though the vaccine has been found to be safe and effective. Complacency stems from thinking immunizations are unneeded because one believes they have a minimal chance of contracting SARS-COV-2 or suffering serious adverse effects, or because it is a persistent barrier to vaccination. The patients think there is a high danger of getting SARS-COV-2 and that getting the vaccination might have a negative impact on their life and the lives of those close to them. A variety of variables influence and complicate vaccine reluctance, such as lack of knowledge about the vaccination, lack of faith in the vaccine itself, false information from social media, conspiracy theories, and worry about side effects are some of the variables associated with SARS-COV-2 vaccine reluctance.

References

Author Info

Gudisa Bereda*
 
Department of Pharmacy, Negelle Health Science College, Guji, Ethiopia
 

Citation: Bereda G: SARS-COV-2 Vaccine Hesitancy

Received: 20-Mar-2023 Accepted: 04-Apr-2023 Published: 11-Apr-2023, DOI: 10.31858/0975-8453.14.4.226-228

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Most Viewed Articles
  • Dental Development between Assisted Reproductive Therapy (Art) and Natural Conceived Children: A Comparative Pilot Study Norzaiti Mohd Kenali, Naimah Hasanah Mohd Fathil, Norbasyirah Bohari, Ahmad Faisal Ismail, Roszaman Ramli SRP. 2020; 11(1): 01-06 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2020.1.01
  • Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of life instrument, short form: Validity in the Vietnamese healthcare context Trung Quang Vo*, Bao Tran Thuy Tran, Ngan Thuy Nguyen, Tram ThiHuyen Nguyen, Thuy Phan Chung Tran SRP. 2020; 11(1): 14-22 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.3
  • A Review of Pharmacoeconomics: the key to “Healthcare for All” Hasamnis AA, Patil SS, Shaik Imam, Narendiran K SRP. 2019; 10(1): s40-s42 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1s.21
  • Deuterium Depleted Water as an Adjuvant in Treatment of Cancer Anton Syroeshkin, Olga Levitskaya, Elena Uspenskaya, Tatiana Pleteneva, Daria Romaykina, Daria Ermakova SRP. 2019; 10(1): 112-117 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.19
Most Downloaded
  • Dental Development between Assisted Reproductive Therapy (Art) and Natural Conceived Children: A Comparative Pilot Study Norzaiti Mohd Kenali, Naimah Hasanah Mohd Fathil, Norbasyirah Bohari, Ahmad Faisal Ismail, Roszaman Ramli SRP. 2020; 11(1): 01-06 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2020.1.01
  • Manilkara zapota (L.) Royen Fruit Peel: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review Karle Pravin P, Dhawale Shashikant C SRP. 2019; 10(1): 11-14 » doi: 0.5530/srp.2019.1.2
  • Pharmacognostic and Phytopharmacological Overview on Bombax ceiba Pankaj Haribhau Chaudhary, Mukund Ganeshrao Tawar SRP. 2019; 10(1): 20-25 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.4
  • A Review of Pharmacoeconomics: the key to “Healthcare for All” Hasamnis AA, Patil SS, Shaik Imam, Narendiran K SRP. 2019; 10(1): s40-s42 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1s.21
  • A Prospective Review on Phyto-Pharmacological Aspects of Andrographis paniculata Govindraj Akilandeswari, Arumugam Vijaya Anand, Palanisamy Sampathkumar, Puthamohan Vinayaga Moorthi, Basavaraju Preethi SRP. 2019; 10(1): 15-19 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.3